Jeremy Moss (a Democrat) is Michigan‘s only openly gay senator. He issued a caution on Thursday about newly proposed legislation which seeks to overturn the Supreme Court protection for same-sex relationships. Moss acknowledged that the current resolution was not legally enforceable but urged people to be “prepared for the worst” and express concern about the possibility of the Supreme Court reversing its landmark decision. Obergefell v. Hodges decision.
The Right to Same-Sex Marriage: What it means
In various states, Republican legislators have introduced resolutions to try to get the Supreme Court’s attention. Obergefell v. HodgesThe 2015 decision that made same-sex relationships legal in all 50 states. Clarence Thomas of the conservative Supreme Court and Samuel Alito, who are both prominent members of the Court, have expressed their wish for the Court to review the case in the past. They were indicating that they would be willing to possibly overturn a precedent. The actions of Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, two conservative Supreme Court Justices who are well-known in their own right, have previously expressed their desire for the court to revisit the case and potentially overturn the precedent.
Gallup’s 2024 poll indicates that the majority of Americans support same-sex relationships, yet there remain significant partisan differences. A Gallup poll conducted in 2024 shows that Republicans are less supportive than Democrats. These differences highlight the ideological divides which continue to drive the debate.
The Michigan Resolution: What you need to know
An opinion article published in the Detroit Free PressSenator Jeremy Moss criticized a resolution recently introduced by Michigan GOP representative Josh Schriver. He called it “a statement about the values Schriver holds and those of his six co-sponsors.” Rep Schriver’s resolution was introduced Tuesday and condemns directly the Supreme Court’s decision. Obergefell v. HodgesIt asserts it’s “at odds” with the Constitution and principles that founded the United States. In the resolution, it is argued that constitutional interpretation should be taken into account. Obergefell It uses a definition for “liberty,” which is not in line with the intent of those who framed the Constitution. Further, it claims that this ruling violates the Declaration of Independence which asserts that human dignity was innate. Obergefell The government is not the source of human dignity.
In the last decade, landmark Obergefell v. Hodges Certain individuals and lawmakers have been protesting the decision. Its enshrinement that same-sex couples are entitled to marry has also become an issue of contention. The actions taken by these individuals and legislators take the form legislative resolutions that explicitly call for the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse its decision. ObergefellAs seen in Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota. The measures taken by these states are part of a larger effort to undermine the foundations for marriage equality in the United States.
Since the ruling of 5-4 in Obergefell. After President Donald Trump appointed three justices in his first term, the court’s ideology shifted further to its right. The shift is already evident in overturning precedents. Most notably, the decision of 2022 to reverse Roe V. WadeSince 1973, the law had guaranteed abortion rights. The security of rights such as same-sex relationships has been questioned.
Respect for Marriage Act was signed by Joe Biden into law in 2022 to ensure that same-sex married couples have more protection. Bipartisan legislation requires that same-sex and interracial relationships be legally recognized in all 50 states.
Senator Jeremy Moss argues the resolution of Representative Josh Schriver “could be the beginning of a movement in politics to have it overturned.” [same-sex marriage] before a now-more-conservative Supreme Court.” He called for “a public-led referendum to repeal Michigan Marriage Amendment 2004 and protect marriage equality.” He called for a “public-led ballot proposal to repeal the 2004 Michigan Marriage Amendment and protect marriage equality.”
Moss warned that, if Obergefell Michigan, if the ruling were reversed, “would go back to language in our constitution that prohibits same-sex relationships.” In order to prevent this, he advocates for the repealing of this text, whether through a citizen initiated ballot measure that requires a certain number of signatures, or by a vote of two thirds of both chambers in each legislative chamber to put the question on the ballot.
Michiganders must take action “now, before it’s too later.” He stressed the importance.
A Gallup survey from 2024 found that 69 percent support same-sex legal marriage. Democrats are more supportive than Republicans. According to the poll, 83 percent support same-sex married, followed by 74 percent independents and 46 percent Republicans.
Viewpoints from Different Perspectives on the Debate
In a Tuesday press conference, Michigan representative Josh Schriver spoke about Obergefell’s decision. “[The decision] The definition of marriage is distorted and undermines our God-given Rights. Christians face increased persecution, while the American family structure becomes confused.
Michigan Senator Jeremy Moss recently posted a X message. stated: You’ve seen how the twits at the MI House have attacked marriage equality. If Obergefell was overturned, MI would revert back to its ban on same-sex relationships in the constitution. This language must be repealed.”
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer addressed the issue on X in a posted video. Michigan allows everyone to marry the person they choose. The law is a non-negotiable. However, right now some extremist members of Michigan’s legislature are asking for the U.S. Supreme Court not to uphold marriage equality. Here’s my response to that: ‘Hell no.’ “We’ve been fighting for marriage equality since the beginning of time. We will protect our families, friends, and neighbors against hateful acts.”
Idaho Representative Heather Scott remarked According to a report by The Idaho Statesman: This resolution was passed to assert our authority as a state to regulate the marriage.
Mat Staver of the Liberty Counsel conservative Christian Ministry asserted last week in a short video: There is no such thing as a right to marriage between same-sex partners in the Constitution. That’s ridiculous. “It’s not whether, but just when,” he added. Obergefell This will be ruled out.
What to Expect: A Look at the Future and its Potential Results
A resolution by Representative Schriver has been sent to the House Government Operations Committee. The resolution has to pass the House Government Operations Committee before it can be advanced. The resolution would be voted on by the House of Representatives after it has been approved by committee. If the House approves the resolution, then it will be sent to the Senate for review. The resolution must be signed by the Governor in order for it to become law.