Everett Kelley is the head of American Federation of Government Employees. He has strongly criticized Elon Musk for his demand that employees of federal agencies account for work done in the past week under threat of being terminated. Kelley called it cruel and disrespectful. The controversy in question highlights the growing concern over private individuals’ role in managing public sector employees.
Kelley said that the union is committed to pursuing legal action against “any unlawful terminations” of federal workers and employees in the United States, a result of the Tesla CEO’s actions and the policies of Donald Trump. The union’s stand highlights the conflicts between efficiency goals and rights for federal workers.
**Why This Matters: Shrinking the Federal Workforce**
There has been an effort to shrink the size of federal employees since Donald Trump became president. Elon Musk, the Department of Government Efficiency, and other DOGE officials have been leading this initiative, which is justified often by government waste and excessive personnel. Musk’s role as “special government employees” has generated significant controversy. Musk is seen by some as an unelected millionaire with considerable influence on the federal workforce, without being accountable to the voters.
**Key Details of the Controversy**
Elon Musk, via his platform of social media, X, (previously Twitter), announced on a Saturday that employees in the federal government were expected to justify their job or risk losing it.
Musk announced that, “In line with the instructions of President @realDonaldTrump all federal workers will receive an email in due course asking to know what they accomplished last week.” Musk posted that failure to reply will be interpreted as resignation.
The Office of Personnel Management sent emails to federal employees in different U.S. Government agencies on Saturday. In these emails, they were instructed to respond with “approx. The emails instructed them to reply with “approx. NPR reported that ET is the time zone.
Legal challenges are expected, including from AFGE. It is a question of whether or not the Trump Administration and Musk’s DOGE are able to terminate workers for failing to comply with these requests.
JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images
Kelley said in a statement: “Once more, Elon Musk, and the Trump Administration, have demonstrated their total disdain towards federal employees, and for the vital services that they provide the American public.” In a statement, Kelley echoed the frustrations of federal employees.
Kelley also criticized the request as “cruel, and disrespectful, to hundreds of thousand veterans, many of whom are in their second civil service uniform, by forcing them justify their jobs to an out-of touch billionaire, privileged but unelected, who has performed not a single honest hour of public service during his lifetime.” The sentiment reflects the disconnect perceived between the expectations of the private sector and reality in public service.
AFGE is already pursuing legal action to protect federal workers from mass layoffs. They claim that probationary periods for newly hired employees are being abused. This shows AFGE’s dedication to safeguarding its members’ rights and livelihoods.
Attorneys general of 14 states also filed another lawsuit in the beginning of this month to stop mass layoffs. They argued that Musk’s “expansive power” was a violation of the Appointments clause. Musk is not a principal officer, according to the attorneys general. The U.S. district judge Tanya Chutkan, however, denied the request for the block of the layoffs. She cited a lack of immediate irreparable damage resulting from the layoffs.
**Expert Perspectives on the Federal Employee Situation**
**Suzanne Summerlin, a labor attorney specializing in federal labor relations**, commented to NPR that terminating employees for non-response would likely be deemed a disproportionate punishment by a labor arbitrator, suggesting a letter of reprimand or suspension as more appropriate. Her legal expertise gives her a unique perspective regarding potential violations of employee rights.
**Judge Tanya Chutkan** expressed concern that “DOGE appears to be moving in no sort of predictable and orderly fashion,” emphasizing the lack of congressional oversight. The judge highlighted the dangers of having a citizen run an organization with no accountability.
**Josh Blackman, a constitutional law professor at South Texas College of Law**, told ABC News that early lawsuits might fail due to uncertainty surrounding Musk’s actions and the need for concrete evidence of substantial authority. Blackman provides insight on the issues that arise in these cases.
**Alina Habba, a Trump aide,** stated on Fox News that there would be “repercussions for people” trying to “step in Trump’s way.” This statement intensifies tensions already present in federal employee’s jobs due to political pressure.
**Future Expectations**
In the weeks and months to come, mass layoffs are likely to increase and possibly continue. This indicates that the employment environment in federal government will remain turbulent. In the face of these shifts, it is likely that both the AFGE as well as other parties will remain vigilant to protect federal employees’ rights and their jobs. The federal workforce’s future is still uncertain.